Oregon allows ex-prostitutes to become teachers

Got something to share with the reading public that isn't an action but should be read?

Moderators: delphyne, oneangrygirl, deedle, sam

Oregon allows ex-prostitutes to become teachers

Postby sam » Mon May 14, 2007 10:15 am

When I worked for Big Brothers Big Sisters it was stressed that the social workers weren't to look for perfect people to be Bigs, they were to look for sincere people who had problems they were overcoming and who were willing to share those experiences with a Little. -sam

Senate OKs change to teacher licensing rules on prostitution

By Julia Silverman, AP Education Writer
Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:22 AM PDT

SALEM - Women who have been convicted on misdemeanor prostitution charges could be eligible for an Oregon teaching license, under legislation that passed the state Senate on Friday, 20-7.

Sen. Margaret Carter, D-Portland, argued passionately for the measure, invoking the gospel of redemption and forgiveness, and the sins of judgment, in a floor speech that riveted her colleagues and quieted the often-buzzing chamber.

“If a person is able to break free and turn their lives around, we as a society should recognize the strength and bravery required to take those steps,” Carter thundered. “I have truly prayed about this bill and all its implications, and thought about why I know it is the right thing to do.”

Carter had pushed similar legislation in the 2005 session, but withdrew the proposal before it made it to the floor, after strong signals that it would not pass in the then-Republican-controlled house, and that even some of her Democratic colleagues were nervous about voting for the bill.

On Friday, she acknowledged that the bill could still be “politically difficult” to explain, and several Democrats, including Sens. Laurie Monnes Anderson of Gresham and Richard Devlin of Tigard, did vote against it.

“There are plenty of places people can find redemption besides our schools,” said State Sen. Larry George, R-Sherwood, who was among the “no” votes. “Our number one priority has to be the safety of our children.”
Advertisement

But the proposal did draw support from a few Republicans, including Sen. Jeff Kruse, R-Roseburg, a conservative.

Under the proposed legislation, a license wouldn't be automatically granted to a woman with a misdemeanor prostitution conviction in her past. Instead, each applicant would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Oregon Teacher Standards and Practices Commission. And the conviction would have to be at least five years old for a woman to be considered for a teaching license or work in another capacity in a school.

Similar laws already exist in the neighboring states of California, Washington, Idaho and Nevada. Now Carter is arguing that it's time for the same courtesy to be extended to former prostitutes in Oregon, many of whom, she said, are victims of sexual abuse, rape or inc*st. Others, she said, are forced into prostitution via sex-trafficking, or by a family member, and all deserve a second chance.

Such women, Carter contends, can be role models for students who might be headed down the wrong paths.

Oregon law prohibits anyone who has been convicted of a lengthy list of felony crimes, including murder, kidnapping, rape, sodomy and inc*st, from receiving a teaching license.

The proposal now moves to the Oregon House for consideration.
"Your orgasm can no longer dictate my oppression"

Trisha Baptie
sam
chaotic good
 
Posts: 4391
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:54 am

Postby elfeminista » Sun May 20, 2007 10:58 pm

“There are plenty of places people can find redemption besides our schools,” said State Sen. Larry George, R-Sherwood, who was among the “no” votes. “Our number one priority has to be the safety of our children.”
Advertisement "

Watch him turn up on that "client list" of johns/prostitutors that woman is threatening to release..
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
elfeminista
antiporn star
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Postby delphyne » Mon May 21, 2007 4:31 am

Yeah, it's just weird that he would argue that ex-prostitutes are a threat to children's safety.

If they care about children's safety they would be screening male teachers' computers for barely legal porn and the like.
delphyne
antiporn star
 
Posts: 2930
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:59 am


Return to essays, articles, rants for public view

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests