Is Jenna Jameson an inappropriate dinner date?

[sunnysmiles]

Gag Factor: 11/10

I can't begin to state how ing this is - in so many ways. Militarism/conservatism/sexism/hypermasculinity...my brain is heating up. It's okay to see you suck cock, it's okay for us to enjoy it - but at the end of the day you need to know you are a super-slut and we can't look like assholes because of your slutiness... Read on how the major says "he's a fan". These people are such hypocrites. And yet, the liberatory aspects of pornography are going to save all of us women! Don't forget we are expressing ourselves sexually - yeah me showing my pussy to men - is really going to teach them a lesson!

I don't get it. Someone theorize this before my head explodes. Disgusting. Bloggers? Pls theorize. Oh my head hurts now.

http://entertainment1. sympatico.msn.ca/Is+Jenna+Jameson+an+inappropriate+dinner+date/Celebs/News/ContentPosting.aspx?isfa=1&newsitemid=KP03110607&feedname=CP-SHOWBIZ_V2&show=False&number=0&showbyline=False&subtitle=&detect=&abc=abc


SAN DIEGO (KP International) It appears 800 marines may miss out on the opportunity to dine with Ultimate Fighter Tito Ortiz and his girlfriend Jenna Jameson.


The former UFC champion was scheduled to be the guest of honour at the Marine Corps Air Station Miramar birthday ball in San Diego. However, upon hearing Ortiz was planning to bring his porn star girlfriend as his date, organizers apparently changed their mind.

"There is some serious consternation here about having your girlfriend attend our ball," read an email sent to Ortiz from Major Jason Johnston. "Of course I and a lot of Marines are very excited about it, but many of our commanders feel it might be inappropriate for the type of event we are having. It is professionally embarrassing for me to have to possibly retract our invitation, especially when I am such a big fan."

More links:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11012006/go ... ix/pagesix. htm

http://xbiz. com/news_piece.php?id=17868 (possibly a porn industry link - I am unsure)

http://www.marinecorpstimes. com/story.php?f=1-292925-2315509.php (the marine's news source)

[sunnysmiles]

Let me clarify here: It's okay for the military (the marines as a part of the military) to invite 'a burlesque troop' using TAX PAYER'S MONEY to entertain the troops. It's okay for the US military to create the current thai sex tourism industry in the 70s during nam. It's alright when YOU PAY for their services. It's not alright when you are on an 'equal footing' with them.

https://eteraz.wordpress. com/2006/08/28/booty-dancers-in-haditha-iraq/

Men know that pornography is the 'writing of whores' - because that is what women in porn are to men. By men "PAYING" women for it, they get to exert their dominance. But if women start assuming they are equal to the men that 'pay them' - well no way! The woman is out of line, she ought to know she's a 'whore'.

And this is precisely what is going on with the Jameson incident.

Edited to add: The reason why I think this example is really important is - you don't get any bigger than Jenna Jameson in the porn industry. If Jenna had been Paris Hilton (a woman with one video) she would have been 'okay' because Hilton is not classified as a 'porn star', Jameson is.

It just proves that society in general can purchase all the vids they want - yet the women in the vids are still 'whores' despite their fame and fortune.

Edited to add again: Had this been pamela andersen who was invited to the ball, men would jump!

You know why? Because both pamela andersen and paris hilton in men's eyes were the 'victims' of pornography being made by 'famous men'. I.e. men can therefore 'watch pam and paris being fucked' but also be assured that they did not do so as 'willing participants'. I.e. their peers, i.e. other men like tommy lee and that 30 yr old guy who made the paris vid, were the ones who 'leaked' the videos. I am positive that there was a time when pam andersen did a military show or something... I can't remember.

So in this situation you'd have to be a 'virginal whore', i.e. a woman who is a good whore and being rightfully fucked by a man who is the agressor, as long as she is 'rightfully fucked'.

I can't imagine the military turning away hefner ACCOMPANIED by bunnies, or Ron Jeremy etc...

But in this situation Jameson is the 'vilest' whore (as delphyne describes it in her defn of porn post) by being an uninhibited and open 'porn star' who earns more than any other woman in porn by using her body.