How many times have antip*rn feminists said that women are raped to make p*rn, and how many times were we insulted and our claims called preposterous along with other, nastier adjectives?
Jury Decides Consent Is Not Required For Girls Gone Wild
http://jezebel.com/5594774/jury-decides ... -gone-wild
Looks like when poor women, non-English women, Christian women, or prostituted women are raped to make porn that's certainly not okay, but it's also not rage-inducing to a point beyond the pale.
But when men raping to make p*rn happens to a woman that readers can see a lot of themselves in - an ordinary woman dancing in a club - no insults are tossed at the messenger and she is readily believed. It's not as if p*rnography isn't full of videos depicting rape complete with many non-Jezebelish women saying the p*rn made of them was rape, so why aren't Linda Lovelace and Shelley Lubben and Rebecca Mott and hundreds of other rape victims believed?
Pro-porn feminists understand that "Jane Doe" dancing didn't mean she deserved to have her rape made into p*rn, while simultaneously considering sexual assault an ugly but begrudgingly accepted consequence of prostitution. If anyone at Jezebel has ever gotten outraged at what multitudes of men did to Rebecca they haven't pulled out a finger long enough to say so on the internet, not like they've used all ten fingers to defend not-uncommonly-rape p*rn.
Sometimes you gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet, and sometimes you gotta let a few thousand women be raped every year to make a diverse p*rn industry.