Page 1 of 1

Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:09 am
by laurelin
Prepare to be thoroughly pissed off:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=423549&in_page_id=1772&in_author_id=322

Let's get the caveat out of the way from the off. The five women murdered in Ipswich were tragic, lost souls who met a grisly end. I sincerely hope whoever killed them is caught, charged and convicted.

No one with a shred of humanity would wish upon them their ghastly lives and horrible deaths. But Mother Teresa, they weren't.


And I know this might sound frightfully callous in the current hysterical, emotional climate, but we're not all guilty.


We do not share in the responsibility for either their grubby little existences or their murders. Society isn't to blame.


It might not be fashionable, or even acceptable in some quarters, to say so, but in their chosen field of "work'=", death by strangulation is an occupational hazard.


That doesn't make it justifiable homicide, but in the scheme of things the deaths of these five women is no great loss.


They weren't going to discover a cure for cancer or embark on missionary work in Darfur. The only kind of missionary position they undertook was in the back seat of a car.


Of course their friends and families are grieving. That's what friends and families do. But they should also be asking themselves if there was anything they could have done to prevent what happened.


If you discovered your daughter had gone on the game to feed her heroin habit, wouldn't you move heaven and earth to get her off it?


Frankly, I'm tired of the lame excuses about how they all fell victim to ruthless pimps who plied them with drugs. These women were on the streets because they wanted to be.


We are all capable of free will. At any time, one or all of them could have sought help from the police, or the church, or a charity, or a government agency specifically established to deal with heroin addicts. They chose not to.


The tortuous twistings of the sisterhood over the past week have been a joy to behold. The 30-yearold Spare Rib T-shirts have been brought out of mothballs and we've been treated to the All Men Are Bastards/Rapists/Murderers mantra from assorted Glendas who ought to be old enough to know better.


We've heard the well-rehearsed arguments for legalised and regulated prostitution, as if we were living under the Taliban. The fact is, we've already got de facto legal brothels on every High Street.


They're call saunas or massage parlours.


As I remarked when the Labour MP Joe Ashton was once caught in a Siamese "sauna" in Northampton, he must have been the only man in Britain ever to go to a massage parlour for a massage. It doesn't get much more glamorous than that.


These five women were on the streets because even the filthiest, most disreputable back-alley "sauna" above a kebab shop wouldn't give them house room.


The men who used them were either too mean to fork out whatever a massage parlour charges, or simply weren't fussy. Some men are actually turned on by disgusting, drug-addled street whores. Where there's demand, there'll always be supply.


This wasn't a case of women going on the game to put bread on the table, or to look after their "babies". That's what the welfare state is for. They did it for drugs.


The gormless Guardianistas simply refuse to confront this blindingly obvious reality. They would rather deify celebrity druggies such as Kate Moss and Will Self than face the truth that hard drugs wreck lives.


What I find most objectionable about all this is the attempt to make us all feel responsible for the murders. There is a nasty whiff of Lady Di about the enforced mood of mourning, with even the Old Bill coming across like hand-wringing archbishops.


At Ipswich Town's home game on Saturday, there was a minute's silence. We were supposed to believe that this was a true reflection of the community's sympathy.


I don't buy it. Most people went along with it in the spirit of emotional correctness and through fear of getting their heads kicked in if they didn't.


There was only one thing missing, but don't bet against it.


When Blair gets back from saving the Middle East, don't be surprised if he turns up at the funeral of one of these unfortunate women to deliver a lip-trembling, tear-stained eulogy: "She was the People's Prostitute".

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:32 pm
by RGM
Apologism in action really is an amazing sight to behold. The counter-balancing statements that permeate the article are just amazing. First it's this was despicable, next it's this is an occupational hazard on the same plane of existence as getting your tie caught in the paper shredder: sometimes bad stuff happens at work. First it's they didn't deserve this, next it's well, they weren't exactly great people anyways so it's not a big deal.

I think that BB's essay on "acceptable losses" readily applies here, eh?

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:00 pm
by jo
What a fitting name he has.

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:50 pm
by oneangrygirl
who the fuck is this?

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:54 pm
by MaggieH
oag wrote:who the fuck is this?


Huh? I wonder...

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:48 am
by rmott
This man is a "journalist" who writes for the Daily Mail's in England. He is self-publicist who see his mission to offend as many liberal-thinking Guardian-readers as possible.
He is a very nasty piece of work.
I saw this a few days, and it brought up emotions that I thought I had lost. When I read being that death by strangulation was just a job hazard - I scream at my computer. It brought up memories of much men who used prostituted women and girls really hate them.
In my experiences, some men found it funny to say they could murder a prostitute and no-one would care.
This type of article said that plainly on a very public forum.
It not surpising most prostitutes women and girls whether living the life, or have exited, choose to be silent about the horrors they have experienced.

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:03 am
by MaggieH
rmott wrote:This man is a "journalist" who writes for the Daily Mail's in England. He is self-publicist who see his mission to offend as many liberal-thinking Guardian-readers as possible.
He is a very nasty piece of work.


Thanks, Rmott, for the info.

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:53 am
by resisterance
he's a household name over here, representing the very worst of bigoted, selfish, ignorant, ranting british "blokes".

Re: Littlejohn: 'the death of five prostitutes is no great loss'

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:02 pm
by StuartM
Thankfully I've never read any of his articles until now but I know he's written regularly for both The Sun and The Daily Mail - two extremely right-wing newspapers which are always attacking immigrants and single parents and every other marginalised group in society. The nearest equivalent in the USA to someone like Littlejohn is probably Rush Limbaugh (the man who invented the term 'feminazi' to describe any woman who he considers a threat to his own privileged position). It really is disgusting to see how much coverage ranting fanatics like that get in the media but obviously it's not in their interests to encourage people to think very much about anything - far easier, and far more convenient, to simply feed the public a load of bigoted nonsense.