I guess delphine was talking about this type of 'leftist guy" before=
Check out 'leftists rebel's post..
http://blog.myspace .com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=143131169&blogID=312302935
link broken before .com.
ledtist rebel male "on women's place"....
Moderators: delphyne, oneangrygirl, deedle, sam
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
ledtist rebel male "on women's place"....
by elfeminista » Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:26 pm
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
- elfeminista
- antiporn star
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Brooklyn
by delphyne » Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:45 pm
Oh how funny, before I went to the site I thought that I'd have to link to the Alternet article on Jensen's book and the scumbags who were commenting there, if 
ingly sexist leftist men are the topic.
You're right that that guy is "a sex crime waiting to happen". That's what I thought when I read the comments at Alternet - those men are rapists, not potential rapists, but rapists. If they haven't acted on it, it's just because they haven't had the opportunity.
Rapists are able to be completely open about their predilections in our society as long as they hide it under the guise of being pro-porn.
ingly sexist leftist men are the topic.
You're right that that guy is "a sex crime waiting to happen". That's what I thought when I read the comments at Alternet - those men are rapists, not potential rapists, but rapists. If they haven't acted on it, it's just because they haven't had the opportunity.
Rapists are able to be completely open about their predilections in our society as long as they hide it under the guise of being pro-porn.
- delphyne
- antiporn star
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:59 am
by bluecoat28 » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:37 am
He writes:
I PUKE!!!!! At least people criticized his shitty response.
Women need to supply sexuality to men at a rate Men need to release. You can’t expect Man to spend 500 dollars and woo women for 2 month before they can release the chemicals that are building up in their bodies. The way it should be is; women provide sexual release, experience, intimacy regardless of relationship, romantic or sexual interest. I don’t mean to imply they have to be completely subservient, nor be expected to do every sexual act to strangers or lovers. But they should have the common courtesy to give love to anyone and everyone to some extent.
Sex is giving love to someone, Love is not violence. Sex is love
It should be given to all whether it is friendship or romance.
I PUKE!!!!! At least people criticized his shitty response.
- bluecoat28
- antiporn star
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 7:35 am
by Evo » Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:55 am
Wow. I can't believe I missed that post. BRS is a myspace buddy of mine and one of the only males who responds positively to my posts about porn. I will have to go and thank him for that post.
He also appears to have deleted the pig's comments with good reason, but I got a general idea of what was said from the rebuttals.
I'm sorry, I FORGOT that I am supposed to serve as public fuckdoll to any and all that should care to use me. What a prude I've been all this time.
So when is it going to be OK for me to go around forcing random men to take a strap on in the pooper? I feel I have a right to do that, so they should just goddamn take it already!
All joking aside, I think I'm going to go hide all sharp objects and prescription medications from myself for awhile if that is how the "leftist males" feel.
He also appears to have deleted the pig's comments with good reason, but I got a general idea of what was said from the rebuttals.
I'm sorry, I FORGOT that I am supposed to serve as public fuckdoll to any and all that should care to use me. What a prude I've been all this time.
So when is it going to be OK for me to go around forcing random men to take a strap on in the pooper? I feel I have a right to do that, so they should just goddamn take it already!
All joking aside, I think I'm going to go hide all sharp objects and prescription medications from myself for awhile if that is how the "leftist males" feel.
- Evo
- antiporn star
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:16 am
- Location: DC Suburbs, MD
by elfeminista » Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:50 pm
To hell with them Sister, keep the sharp objects close at hand...
I just finished having drinks with a remarkable woman (well she had drinks i had a cappuccino, I dont drink),
an activist for indigenous peoples. She told me a story
of something that happened to her in Brazil, and it involves 2 would be rapists, a sharp object, her martial arts skills, her defending herself and her rescue of a *male* the would be rapists had hostage at the same time. This woman is no teller of tall tales, I know her and admire her. I am going to write down the story she told me. It is Amazing. I will ask her if it is ok to share the story with others even though I would of course not use her name.
I just finished having drinks with a remarkable woman (well she had drinks i had a cappuccino, I dont drink),
an activist for indigenous peoples. She told me a story
of something that happened to her in Brazil, and it involves 2 would be rapists, a sharp object, her martial arts skills, her defending herself and her rescue of a *male* the would be rapists had hostage at the same time. This woman is no teller of tall tales, I know her and admire her. I am going to write down the story she told me. It is Amazing. I will ask her if it is ok to share the story with others even though I would of course not use her name.
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
- elfeminista
- antiporn star
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Brooklyn
by MaggieH » Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:25 am
Elfeminista wrote:
OK, sure. If she agrees to share her story, please post it on G'berg sometime. I would be interested in reading it.
This woman is no teller of tall tales, I know her and admire her. I am going to write down the story she told me. It is Amazing. I will ask her if it is ok to share the story with others even though I would of course not use her name.
OK, sure. If she agrees to share her story, please post it on G'berg sometime. I would be interested in reading it.
"The assumption that "most women are innately heterosexual'' stands as a theoretical and political stumbling block for many women. It remains a tenable assumption, partly because lesbian existence has been written out of history or catalogued under disease;. . . partly because to acknowledge that for women heterosexuality may not be a "preference" at all but something that has had to be imposed, managed, organized, propagandized and maintained by force is an immense step to take if you consider yourself freely and "innately" heterosexual. Yet the failure to examine heterosexuality as an institution is like failing to admit that the economic system called capitalism or the caste system of racism is maintained by a variety of forces, including both physical violence and false consciousness. . ."
-- Adrienne Rich, in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence: http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm
“The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men.” ~ Alice Walker
-- Adrienne Rich, in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence: http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm
“The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men.” ~ Alice Walker
- MaggieH
- antiporn star
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:36 am
by elfeminista » Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:48 am
I Just spoke to her, she said "thank you for asking but don't do it."
She is so baddass...this person should write a book.
She is so baddass...this person should write a book.
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
- elfeminista
- antiporn star
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Brooklyn
by MaggieH » Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:29 am
Elfeminista wrote:
Well, what a shame... Please let us know if she ever changes her mind someday, though.
I Just spoke to her, she said "thank you for asking but don't do it."
Well, what a shame... Please let us know if she ever changes her mind someday, though.
"The assumption that "most women are innately heterosexual'' stands as a theoretical and political stumbling block for many women. It remains a tenable assumption, partly because lesbian existence has been written out of history or catalogued under disease;. . . partly because to acknowledge that for women heterosexuality may not be a "preference" at all but something that has had to be imposed, managed, organized, propagandized and maintained by force is an immense step to take if you consider yourself freely and "innately" heterosexual. Yet the failure to examine heterosexuality as an institution is like failing to admit that the economic system called capitalism or the caste system of racism is maintained by a variety of forces, including both physical violence and false consciousness. . ."
-- Adrienne Rich, in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence: http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm
“The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men.” ~ Alice Walker
-- Adrienne Rich, in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence: http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm
“The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men.” ~ Alice Walker
- MaggieH
- antiporn star
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:36 am
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to essays, articles, rants for public view
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests