Man tries to rent child with option to buy

Got something to share with the reading public that isn't an action but should be read?

Moderators: delphyne, oneangrygirl, deedle, sam

Man tries to rent child with option to buy

Postby sam » Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:30 pm

http://www.upi.com /NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/06/01/man_tries_to_rent_child_with_option_to_buy/5814/

Man tries to rent child with option to buy

DALLAS, June 1 (UPI) -- Bail has been set at $100,000 for a married Texas father who paid an undercover Dallas police officer $100 to "rent" a 9-year-old girl for the night.

Kevin Russell Moake, 49, was arrested outside a fast food restaurant immediately after he forked over the money in a sting operation set up by Dallas police, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported Friday.

Police said Moake originally planned to buy the fictional Mexican girl outright for about $2,000 but asked for a rental with option to buy because he didn't have a place to keep her.

Lt. C.L. Williams, head of the department's child exploitation unit, said the sting operation began after police learned Wednesday Moake had been trying to buy a child for sex.

"It really speaks volumes about what these criminals think," Williams said. "For him to take a cold call from someone and think he could buy sex with a child is really mind-boggling."

Moake was jailed on charges of suspicion of attempting to traffic in humans and attempting sexual performance with a child.
"Your orgasm can no longer dictate my oppression"

Trisha Baptie
sam
chaotic good
 
Posts: 4391
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:54 am

Postby CoolAunt » Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:09 am

I was disgusted with one of our local news stations when the talking head said that the man "was willing to pay as much as $4500 for the girl." As if a nine year old girl isn't worth nearly that much. :roll:
CoolAunt
antiporn star
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:13 pm

Postby laurelin » Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:42 am

I also dislike the way they report it as paying 'to have sex with a child'. No, they are paying to rape a child. I wish they'd use accurate language, show these rapist cowards for what they are.
laurelin
antiporn star
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:31 am
Location: UK

Postby Cellycel » Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:56 am

You said it Laurelin. What on earth is child sex? There is no child sex, it's rape.
Cellycel
antiporn star
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:03 pm

Postby elfeminista » Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:44 am

Right, so many curve balls, linguistic psychological, political,, everything...
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
elfeminista
antiporn star
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Andrew » Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:39 pm

RIght all! THe nine year girl is beyond price. And no amount of money could justify what he was planning to do. I suspect that ther might be someone willing to pay 4500 to do something TO HIM.
Andrew
antiporn star
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Lost in America

Postby bluecoat28 » Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:20 pm

laurelin wrote:I also dislike the way they report it as paying 'to have sex with a child'. No, they are paying to rape a child. I wish they'd use accurate language, show these rapist cowards for what they are.


seriously.
bluecoat28
antiporn star
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 7:35 am


Return to essays, articles, rants for public view

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 281 guests