is there ever NOT a good time to quote Dworkin?

[sam]

http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin ... rview.html

Michael Moorcock: What do you say to committed feminists who disagree with your approach to pornography and say porn is merely one manifestation among many of a problem with deeper roots?

Andrea Dworkin: I say solve the problem you think is more urgent or goes deeper. Pornography is so important, I think, because of how it touches on every aspect of women's lower status: economic degradation, dehumanisation, woman hating, sexual domination, systematic sexual abuse. If someone thinks she can get women economic equality, for instance, without dealing in some way with the sexual devaluation of women as such, I say she's wrong; but I also say work on it, try, organise; I will be there for her, as a resource, carrying picket signs, making speeches, signing petitions, supporting lawsuits for economic equality. But if she thinks the way to advance women is to organise against those of us who are organising against sexual exploitation and abuse, then I say I don't respect that; it's horizontal hostility, not feminism. Women willing to let other women do the so-called sex work, be the prostitutes, while they lead respectable professional lives in law or in the academy, frankly, make me sick. I concentrate my energy, however, on uniting with women who want to fight sexual exploitation, not on arguing with women who defend it.

[Andrew]

"make me sick" Tell it like it is, Andrea!

[elfeminista]

"It's raining men....halleluya! (again)

One thing i have found is that the more that a feminist cuts to the root by naming the direct mechanism of oppression, the more that she is hated.

Nobody *hates* Annie Sprinkle, Leslie Feinberg, Suzy Bright, Camile Paglia.... etc. Nobody *hates* Post Modern feminist theorists.