gerry-
I think my anwser b was clear. Patriarchal religion is based on the subjugation of Women, in many ways they complement each other, religion and pornography. To get a profound analysis of the connection between religion and porn/prostitution I again, recomend reading both Beyond God The Father and Gyn/Ecology. In a way Patriarchal religion *is* pornography.While Mary Daly's writing style is not like Catharine Mackinnons, or Shulamit Firestone's, she is a triple Phd in Philosophy Theology and Ethics.What she writes is very valid.
In my book there is no such thing as a 'pro porn feminist male' That is not a pro-feminist, that is a diverter. I have been trying to recruit men for a long time. One thing that I have found is that "pro- porn feminist males" nearly allways engage in other antifeminisms, such as publicly criticizing white women for their racism ( This is feminist Womens' discourse not "feminist men's", all I see that do is again, divide and divert Women), and some things that while not directly antifeminism still act as such by the fact that they are diverting focus such as steering feminist women and encouraging people towards other forms of activism, , and interestingly, arguing with other male pro-feminists. I suspect that their real interest is in gaining attention to themselves and feel that they are a trojan horse within feminism, wether they themselves are concious of it or not.
i don't like to think that porn use is chiefly a matter of habit because I fear it will be pathologized, or seen as another social ill as with drug use, but realistically speaking, exposure means use.
I thought the question was which men do not use porn. As to it being called a social ill, it certainly *is* a social ill, one that hurts Women and is based on the need of our patriarchal society to develop tools with which to control class Woman. It exists legal and accepted because Women are still somehow not considered people. That is why it is *not* considered a social ill.Now our society is going towards considering this crap 'good clean fun".
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart