Fiji women say stop prostitution, Fiji men say tax it

Got something to share with the reading public that isn't an action but should be read?

Moderators: delphyne, oneangrygirl, deedle, sam

Fiji women say stop prostitution, Fiji men say tax it

Postby sam » Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:28 pm

A stop is better, Ali says
http://www.fijitimes.com/story.aspx?id=57770

Monday, February 26, 2007

The Fiji Women's Crisis Centre wants all prostitution stopped, rather than it being legalised, centre co-ordinator Shamima Ali says.

Ms. Ali said there were many reasons why women engaged in prostitution, including poverty and a lack of education.

She said most of the young people who sold their bodies were disempowered and had been victims of abuse.

Ms. Ali said when the country suffered economic setback, an increase in prostitute numbers was to be expected.

"We consider prostitution a form of violence against women and we want it to go away rather than decriminalise it," said Ms Ali.

Fiji Nursing Association general secretary Kuini Lutua said when it came to the health consequences of sex workers, it was important they be given a choice on how to keep themselves safe from sexually transmitted diseases.

She said figures the association received did not indicate prostitutes were a vessel for the spread sexual diseases like HIV/AIDS.

Ms. Lutua said when it came to the large number of people getting paid for sexual favours people should get to the bottom of the matter and find out why there was an increase.

"May be, it is because of the large number of clients for these people. There may be a lot of demand for their services, thus, the increase. May be, it's a bread and butter issue," she said.

She said it was unfair to go after prostitutes.

"It is the clients who should be targeted, if an end is to be brought to prostitution," she said.

Interim Education Minister Netani Sukanaivalu has voiced concern about such issues, revealing his ministry and the Ministry of Social Welfare were working together and a committee had been set up to address such issues.

This comes after a counselling psychologist, Doctor Raymond Chandra, this week argued if prostitution was legalised, prostitutes would contribute in a more positive way to the State.

"If prostitution is made legal in Fiji, Fiji will be in league with many progressive countries of the world.

"Prostitution would no longer be a dirty, dangerous trade in the dark," he said. Women who are forced by circumstances into prostitution would be much safer in every way."

He said legalised prostitution would keep these "businesswomen" off the streets and into clean, supervised and licensed premises where they could operate.

"All these businesswomen would be medically checked by designated health workers for the safety of their clients and themselves," he said.

"Income generate by license fees and income tax, however small, would be a bonus for the State."
"Your orgasm can no longer dictate my oppression"

Trisha Baptie
sam
chaotic good
 
Posts: 4391
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:54 am

Postby Andrew » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:52 pm

If Ted Turner wanted evidence to back up his proposal that men be disenfranchised ( has HE stopped voting yet?) this would fit the bill.[/u]
Andrew
antiporn star
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Lost in America

Postby elfeminista » Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:23 pm

Did Ted Turner really say that? Hmmmm.

Well If he did, it would not be a good idea for him to stop voting *now* would it, if he wanted to see the day....?

"Income generate by license fees and income tax, however small, would be a bonus for the State."


The real "bonus to the state is the maintaining of the status quo, of course.
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
elfeminista
antiporn star
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Andrew » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:48 pm

I read the quote in an email from The White House Project, which I probably still have filed away. SO, I guess he did say it.
Andrew
antiporn star
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Lost in America

Postby elfeminista » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:49 am

Imagine what it must have been like for Women all of those years.Black Men who had been slaves had already been able to vote for over 50 years, but women still were disenfranchised. a Woman in 1919 in the US could not vote.
"I was analyzing a phenomenon I am seeing on the internet-- a proliferation of blogs in which the blogger identifies as a radical feminist, but does not seem to embrace the distinctives of radical feminism as we understand the term in the United States.And you know, I think it's okay if they do that, but I also think it's important to say what I said because otherwise (1) herstoric radical feminism gets erased; (2) people new to feminism never hear what herstoric radical feminism really was or is."~ Heart
elfeminista
antiporn star
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Andrew » Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:15 pm

Slight correction there, women could vote in some states before 1919, but not in federal elections.
It would be good if men could sit a few out just to see how it was, but I don't see it happening anytime soon.
Andrew
antiporn star
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: Lost in America


Return to essays, articles, rants for public view

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests