Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Moderator: sam

Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby sam » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:45 pm

Genderberg wasn't supposed to host a Carnival of Radical Feminists, but I made my trap and walked into it.

See, months ago I emailed Heart for permission to put a call for future hosts on the forum with the hope that some blogging members who are radical feminists would volunteer; not all are radfems. Her reply unmistakably identified the next open slot as Genderberg's and my inner stepchild cracked a wry smile at the realization Heart had misunderstood (or did she? hmm) my intention. She was thrilled with the idea and then I was stuck.

The pulse-quickening risk of pushing into unknown internet territories to explore for material was mostly pleasant. The same will not be said for sifting through the official carnival entries, but offenders were usually apparent.

After the carnival host concept solidified in my noggin, my second thought was that I wanted to see my favorite essay on prostitution in the next edition. The problem was that the essay didn't live anywhere online, only in the book Not for Sale. I am thrilled to announce author De Clarke has sent me an electronic version to share, because I have read hundreds of essays on prostitution and this one stands out for its singular round-up of crisscrossing issues delivered in mellifluous prose. The addendum on Abu Ghraib is not only eerily relevant today but a spectacular explanation for why men make and use pornography.

"Prostitution for everyone: Feminism, globalisation, and the 'sex' industry'" by D.A. Clarke

http://genderberg.com/docs/Prostitution ... ifinal.pdf

First, the prevailing Market-worship mocks and devalues any suggestion of altruism; if women fortunate enough to have escaped sexual exploitation in their own lives demonstrate concern and caring for prostituted women, they are dismissed as naive, unrealistic idealists and (of course) 'ideologues.' The 'sexual liberation' pseudo-progressive ideology then serves to cast women who object to exploitation, profiteering, coercion and other routine practises of the sex industry as 'crypto-conservatives,' 'neo-Victorians,' 'anti-sex,' and so forth. Should either of those barriers fail to discourage the feminist social critic, the neoliberal dogma is trotted out to prove that, for example, the woman eating dog food on the floor of Stern's studio is exactly where she wants to be. Any woman who expresses disgust at the men who enacted and enjoyed this ritual of humiliation is actually an anti-feminist: she is denying the agency and choice exercised by this 'liberated' female, the 'good sport' who is 'tough enough to take it' and needs no sympathy or interference from well-meaning nannies. Just as, of course, the poor are quite capable of pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps and need no insulting assistance from the smothering hands of Big Government.


from addendum
Why did the Nazis take pictures and meticulously document the atrocities committed in the camps? Why did a generation of white hunters take pictures of themselves standing on wild animals they had shot? Why do hunters hang trophy heads on their walls? Why did white people take pictures of lynchings and make them into postcards that were then collected and traded? Why did GIs in Vietnam collect ears and other more private body parts from their victims? Why did ‘Indian fighters’ and bounty hunters in the old American West collect body parts from dead Indians? And – lastly – why do men make documentary pornography?


Here's what else me and contributors (thank you!) culled together for your reading pleasure.

feminists of the radical kind


Charlie Little writes on living our theory.
http://charlielittle.wordpress.com/2009 ... comment-93
Having radical politics, is more than reading the literature and attending the protests. Having radical politics means that with conviction, one’s politics run seamlessly through one’s life, as a benchmark, as a vision, as guidance with all the risks that this takes.


Charlie also offers a "Report of Autonomous Womyn’s Gathering".
http://charlielittle.wordpress.com/2009 ... gathering/

Approximately 270 women attended the Autonomous Womyn’s Gathering in Vienna in April. Workshops ranged from feminist anti-facist remberance, to anarcha-feminism, to sustainable agriculture outside of patriarchy… The event was followed by a demonstration in the city centre.


Allecto is one of several radical feminists to declare "Sheila is my sister" on her blog Gorgon Poisons after Sheila Jeffreys became the target of some nastiness in which someone with an ax to grind actually made tote bags declaring "Sheila is not my sister" and called her "anti-sex". Post-maker Rachel scores the pull quote for this one.
http://allecto.wordpress.com/2009/05/23 ... /#comments

These “sex positives” use this tactic of claiming that you’re personally attacking them whenever you oppose some kind of sexual exploitation that they like – and then they come out with these kind of blatant personal attacks!


Other radfems in on the bloggy rebuttal are:
incorrigible radical feminist
Din of Inequity
Supporter of Women's Liberation
Explore/Expand/Express
Anti-Porn Feminists
AROOO
Well, I'll go to the foot of my stairs

A guest gorgon post by Amazon Mancrusher on why "lesbian" has become a dirty word.
http://allecto.wordpress.com/2009/05/05 ... ancrusher/

These days, fewer young women seem to be identifying as lesbian, choosing instead to use queer, gay or pan to describe who they have relationships with and how they feel about their sexuality and political identity.


The burning question on everyone's mind, "What Do Radical Feminists Want?" is answered by Betty McLellan at the Brisbane International Feminist Conference in 2008.
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:uHF ... =firefox-a

Because when the market is all that matters, as in neoliberalism, when greed and competition and profit are raised as the be-all and end-all of life, it means that people can be treated as commodities. And when human life is commodified, experience shows that it is WOMEN who are bought and sold, women who suffer, and women’s experiences of injustice that are ignored. And postmodernism adds to the injustice by suggesting that the reality of violence against women and exploitation of women doesn’t actually exist! There is no such thing as women’s reality. Indeed, there’s no such category as “women”.


The Antiporn Feminists blog quotes from Rebecca Whisnant's "Beyond Multiple Choice" essay, which brought me to read the whole magnificent thing.
http://antipornfeminists.wordpress.com/ ... le-choice/

I've found that students—at least the ones in my classes—are starved for something other than the feel-good, it's-all-about-choice model of pseudo-feminism that they're exposed to elsewhere in the culture. The advertising industry tells them that a new lipstick shade will give them "power," while "freedom" can be theirs with a new variety of tampon. Meanwhile, the rest of the mainstream media assures them that feminism means climbing the corporate ladder, being free to pose for pornography if they want to, doing whatever makes them feel good and not being answerable to anyone for it. (In fact, some of them have dutifully identified this point of view as feminism and concluded—wisely—that it's bullshit.)


Here's one of my favorite Amy's Brain Today pieces, "An Open Letter to Mad Sheila" on the feministiness of one-night stands.
http://www.feminist-reprise.org/wpblog/ ... ad-sheila/

So to the woman who really, truly, honestly says to herself, “Gee, tonight I just want a penis in my vagina. That’s really all I want, and so I’m going to go out and find that,” I say, go sheila. But the minute any other desire creeps in there–a yen for respect, say, for human connection, or even, dare I say it, for “good” sex from a woman’s perspective–I would counsel that sheila to hold her horses.


Maggie Hays discusses how the process of coming out as a lesbian is integrating her life.
http://supporterofwomensliberation.word ... oming-out/

Everyday, I realize that I am not attracted to men anymore (I had merely been socialized to heteronormativity). I am so, so, so much attracted to women.

But I am still closeted in real life. Why?


Maggie also provides a third-person perspective in the style anti-prostitution activist Anne Bissell calls "fusion fiction".
http://supporterofwomensliberation.word ... masochism/

Even back in the days when she’d just been thinking about getting off and ‘that’s it’, she’d kept hearing a little voice at the back of her mind trying to tell her that, somehow, something was not feeling quite right.


Oldy but goody from Biting Beaver, the legendary lioness lives on with "The Rapist Checklist".
http://archiveofthebitingbeaver.wordpre ... st-repost/

Now this post in particular really pissed off a bunch of people at the time and it continues to do so.



activists, advocates, articulate folks


Jenn Hollinger writes at Trafficking Project about legalizing prostitution.
http://traffickingproject.blogspot.com/ ... -help.html

As a result of my experience in the immigrant advocacy and anti-human trafficking fields, I am somewhat leery of the legalization approach. What would happen if the US was to legalize sex work?


Radical pro-feminist Julian Real offers (with language barriers) an inspiring speech by Gudrun Schyman, the former leader of the Left Party in Sweden and co-founder of growing Feminist Initiative women's political party.
http://radicalprofeminist.blogspot.com/ ... ative.html
For decades, I have seen U.S. anglo/white "academically educated" men--you know, the ones who are supposed to be "the smartest", be utterly incapable of reading and understanding basic concepts and principles in radical feminist writings. This is the case even when all involved speaking and writing U.S. American English as a first language. We have to wonder how many additional comprehension and communication problems there are when we move into the realm of translations of different language.


Also from Julian comes this fascinating dialog stretched over nine posts between two pro-feminist men about their porn-fueled misogyny.
http://radicalprofeminist.blogspot.com/ ... tween.html

CAUTION: What follows is a conversation between two men about their abusive behaviors toward girls, women, and others. Any survivor of child sexual abuse, rape, or other form of sexual violation and objectification may be quite triggered by portions of this exchange. All violative behaviors are named as such by at least one of the two people, critically, with remorse and/or regret. Both people do not currently use pornography.


Anti-trafficking colleague James Pond has been assisting victims in Cambodia, and here he writes about sensationalism marring the efforts of activists.
http://jamespond006.blogspot.com/2009/0 ... cking.html

Working in the United States, we are working carefully to approach domestic trafficking in an honest, intellectual, and non-sensational way. We have done this to our best ability in Cambodia and it has paid off. Intellectual engagement is really all there needs to be to communicate the horrors of sex trafficking.


A post from pop culture critic Ethan Stanislawski over at Tyan's Anger proposes "Hate Crime Bill Should Be Used To Revive Interest in Fighting Rape in Pornography".
http://www.tynansanger.com/2009/05/hate ... to_06.html

Anti-gay rights advocates could still write incendiary columns, and pornography and its advocates could still be published freely. What would be disallowed, however, would be to commit violent acts of assault or rape against homosexuals or those who work in porn.


Portland Indymedia radfem Emily Endometrium gives creative suggestions for dealing with cramps.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2009/05/391160.shtml
So, what is a skeptical atheist radical who hates drugs made by male-bodied people to do?...petty theft of tampons from chain stores makes me feel like I'm doing my part to tear down the capitalist machine, and I think tampons should be free anyway. The rush of adreneline throughout the body brings relief to the uterine cramps.


The Apostate went to Amsterdam and her take on it is very much like mine when I visited in 1999; it's the most beautiful city I have ever visited but not intended for women to enjoy.
http://apostate.wordpress.com/2009/04/2 ... /#comments

In Amsterdam, I found the general atmosphere threatening. Not by the Dutch, who see right through you, you tourist scum, but by all the sex tourists. Never mind that I wasn’t available – I was a woman, anatomically and otherwise indistinguishable from those wares in the shop windows. Once they’ve dehumanized a bunch of people who look like me, it’s not hard to dehumanize me personally.


Anna Belle talks agendas new and old in her post about Coretta Scott King and Josephine Baker, two women dedicated to civil rights but not necessarily the civil rights movement.
http://thenewagenda.net/2009/01/19/what ... ine-baker/

We will never know what Coretta Scott King and Josephine Baker could have accomplished if they had unified to expand the Civil Rights movement.


Cath Elliot continues exposing the shady shenanigans of pimps pretending to be sex worker rights advocates.
http://toomuchtosayformyself.wordpress. ... ong-again/
Unfortunately for you and your industry, those of us who oppose you will keep shining a light in the dark places, where the drug addictions, the violence, and and the degradations continue, and we’ll keep exposing you every time you try to cover it up.


Becky Lerner's weeklong journey eating only foraged foods is impressively radical.
http://rebeccalernerwilderness.wordpress.com/

As a project for the web magazine Culture Change, I signed up to eat an entirely wild diet as I forage from sidewalks, parks, wilderness areas and yards in Portland from May 24 through May 30. There was no dumpster diving or mooching off gardens — I survived on wild edibles only.



popular culture


With the tagline "Fuck suicide, girls!", The Homocide Girls offer a Myspace page's worth of reasons to decry oxymoronic "punk porn".
http://www.myspace.com/homicidegirls

What's fucking punk rock about supporting a multi-BILLION dollar industry that makes it's money [literally] off the backs of females?


dandelionfield hit my reset button on a Mary Poppins song revisited through a feminist lens and asks, "Do Gentlemen Rape?"
http://dandelionfield.wordpress.com/200 ... emen-rape/

Oh, it's a jolly holiday with you, Bert
Gentlemen like you are few
Though you're just a diamond in the rough, Bert
Underneath your blood is blue
You'd never think of pressing your advantage
Forbearance is the hallmark of your creed
A lady needn't fear when you are near


In "South Park… feminist?", Jenn from XXBlaze admits a guilty love for South Park I do not share. However, I am a Dethklok fan despite their not-very-metal second season, so I understand her appreciation of excessive, taboo-busting humor for what it is. I just wish thousands of talentless baboons didn't fancy themselves the next John Waters.
http://xxblaze.wordpress.com/2009/04/08 ... -feminist/

Rather than just say that they didn’t like the episode though, numerous viewers gave it a 0/10 when asked. Me thinks this might be because they’re just mad that South Park pulled off a joke at their expense. I have to say, the reaction of people to this episode is even funnier than the episode itself. When pushed, the commentors will eventually resort to excuses such as “vaginas are gross” or “feminism is stupid”.


Another gem from Jenn puts into words some of my feelings on Dateline's To Catch a Predator where the rapists take center stage. There is no boo-hoo big enough to adequately address charges of entrapment. Comments on this are a particularly worthwhile read.
http://xxblaze.wordpress.com/2009/05/16 ... /#comments

It doesn’t shame victims who “led on” the poor wittle man in need of sex. It doesn’t warn parents to chain their whorish daughters to their beds and not let them touch a computer. Instead, it presents the criminals to public and says, “look, the emperor has no clothes, and he likes to rape small children”.


Amananta lends her usual incisiveness to the ubiquity of rape in fiction.
http://amananta.wordpress.com/2009/03/1 ... rtainment/

Overall, in popular fiction written by men, rape scenes are generally used to show what a bad, bad man the rapist is, usually someone of the “other” (black, foreign, a monster). The husband raping his wife, the guy encouraging a girl to drink enough that no one will take her seriously later, the rapist “friend”, are mostly absent. Men’s writing about rape serves two purposes: either to titillate, or to show how bad the villain or the villainous culture in question is.


The Reclusive Leftist apologizes for linking to torture-apologist Glenn Greenwald.
http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2009/05 ... /#comments

Greenwald has vigorously championed torturers’ rights, has explicitly privileged their version of events over that of their victims, and has asserted — in agreement with the torturers — that “no real pain was inflicted” on the victims.

Of course these aren’t the torturers at Gitmo or Abu Ghraib. It’s the film company of “Max Hardcore,” an extreme pornographer who grossly abused women while filming the proceedings for the entertainment of other men.


Rebecca Mott speaks about being captured by a camera.
http://rmott62.wordpress.com/2009/03/10 ... he-camera/

Hell, as if the torturing was not enough. By filming me I was owned, I lost freedom as that film became public property.


From "Relationship Underarm Stick" (Like a protective layer between you & your relationship stink) comes a sobering reminder about a husband's right to sex on demand.
http://www.twolia.com/blogs/relationshi ... ital-rape/
We could just ignore this, write it off as “history,” but these idiotic notions are still with us. They linger in court decisions, media coverage, and even family reactions, even 40+ years later.


And finally, Sady earns my admiration with a post combining humor, feminism and bikes that gets in a dig at the manarchist transport of choice, fixed gear bikes.
http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com/2009/ ... thing.html
It's a troubling thought: what if there is an entire category of hilarious cycles that I am unable to laugh at? Am I simply not angry or aggressive enough to participate in bike-themed humor? Which of the following bikes is more inherently humorous?
"Your orgasm can no longer dictate my oppression"

Trisha Baptie
sam
chaotic good
 
Posts: 4389
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:54 am

Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby feminamist » Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:12 am

Sam, that is a bloody grand line up! :cheers:
It is the primacy of women relating to women, of women creating a new consciousness of and with each other, which is at the heart of women's liberation, and the basis for the cultural revolution. ~ Radicalesbians
feminamist
antiporn star
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:54 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby MaggieH » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:37 am

Thanks a lot, Sam. :) What a wonderful carnival! :hello1:

I will link to it...
"The assumption that "most women are innately heterosexual'' stands as a theoretical and political stumbling block for many women. It remains a tenable assumption, partly because lesbian existence has been written out of history or catalogued under disease;. . . partly because to acknowledge that for women heterosexuality may not be a "preference" at all but something that has had to be imposed, managed, organized, propagandized and maintained by force is an immense step to take if you consider yourself freely and "innately" heterosexual. Yet the failure to examine heterosexuality as an institution is like failing to admit that the economic system called capitalism or the caste system of racism is maintained by a variety of forces, including both physical violence and false consciousness. . ."
-- Adrienne Rich, in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence: http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm

“The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men.” ~ Alice Walker
MaggieH
antiporn star
 
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby Heart » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:40 pm

Wow! Sam, this is a GREAT carnival! And what a great idea to give it its own special forum, ha ha. I wondered what you'd come up with.

I didn't realize until now you weren't volunteering yourself, hee hee. I'm SO GLAD you took this on, you've done a GREAT job.

Heart
I'm a radical feminist, not the fun kind. -- Andrea Dworkin
Heart
antiporn star
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 7:49 pm

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby annared » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:13 am

Thanks for all your work sam, a fabulous carnival. Gawd I just love D.A. Clarke and I've just read the whole 39 pages. :albino:
"...it is the very act of women's bodies being bought and sold by men that sustains the subordinate position of women and children on a global scale". Julie Bindel ________________
annared
antiporn star
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:38 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby Mary_Sunshine » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:40 am

Thank you for this. What a treat. :cheers:
Mary_Sunshine
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:03 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby delphyne » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:10 am

It's great Sam. I'm slowly working my way through it. :flower:
delphyne
antiporn star
 
Posts: 2930
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:59 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby AmazonLaur » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:29 am

This is AMAZING! Thanks! :jawdrp:
"I believe that the destruction of the prostituted class is the most important human rights of our times, and to be frank, it is the most important issue of stripping of human rights of most periods in history. It is made invisible because it mainly done to women and girls – and in most cultures, most periods of history and most countries, women and girls are not classed as fully human, and therefore have no access to human rights." --Rebecca Mott "This is an Emergency"
AmazonLaur
antiporn star
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:20 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby sam » Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:32 pm

Blogger and Genderberg forum member berryblade has invoked the spirit of radical feminism to spontaneously compile the next Carnival, dubbed #23.5

Please click the link to see all her hyperlinks in their fully functioning glory, I don't feel like redundantly coding here.

sam

SEVAS TRA – T.R.I.C
Posted on September 23, 2010 by berryblade

http://theantisocialbutterfly.com/2010/ ... a-t-r-i-c/

So if you wonderful readers of mine didn’t notice, I got a domain! I’m now available at The Antisocial Butterfly dot com. Fear not though, for my old link should still work/re-direct you here.

Because I’m feeling lazy today (and I’m on break, so I’d rather be partying, studying or study-artying, which is my half-arsed combination of the two, cos I actually hate parties) I thought I’d have a little Radical Feminist Link Round Up :)

Also, what happened to the Carnivals of Radical Feminists? How do I start one? Google is not being it’s usual revealing self, and being an online phenomena, I don’t think my local library is going to help me this time.

Over at A Room of One’s Own, Kitty is discussing men trying to give strange womyn (aka, womyn they don’t know) rides in cars, and her own experience in the 1970′s – present with it. This is a really, really common experience (I’d gather) because like Kitty says,
I don’t think I have ever met a female person who was not “asked” to enter a car driven by a strange male.


And I don’t think I have either. All of my friends, current, past and future, that are womyn – have had to deal with this at some point.

And while not strictly a radfem, A Shiny New Coin has written a really good piece about Australia, it’s anti-Islam stance and the irony of a country of colonists complaining about colonisation.

This post is old, and Allecto hasn’t updated in a while (and I don’t have fakebook anymore) but it’s another one detailing what really happens in “Family” courts in Australia.

It’s my birthday in a few weeks, and I’d really love the Raining Blood cake . Which, okay, is totally not radical feminist, but I like cake, and I lurrrve Slayer and why the fuck not combine the two? If someone makes me a zombie cake though, I will probably worship you forever. My skillz are not that mad.

Nuclearnight has some really good debating tips/general advice tips for ‘sex positive’ (yeah, I’m looking at you liberal hedonist pseudo-feminists) feminists who CHOOSE to debate with feminists. You know, the radical kind.

Demonista has an awesome review of a feminist horror movie (or as close as horror movies can get to being feminist) named Teeth. She’s also got a brand spankin’ new post up about mosh pits and the ability to partake in violent, or potentially violent activities.

New radical feminist blogger (but by no means, new to radical feminism) Boner Killer has a great couple of posts up about Unpacking Queer Politics and S&M (inspired, I assume, by Sheila Jeffreys) and one that generated a shit-storm in it’s comments, about “alternative” porn, zombies, and glamourised violence against womyn. Which leads me to believe, that unlike yours truely, most people who are fans of zombies are not fans of them because of the deep-seated and wanky symbolism they involve, but are fans of them because of all the super-cool awesome violence and gore which totally disappoints me. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mind watching a bit of the ol-stimulated-super-horrorshow shit now and then, but there is no fucking way I’d want to see that IRL.

Author of one of my favourite books ever (The Sexual Politics of Meat) has her own blog, that is, the wonderful Carol J. Adams, and she has a really interesting entry about her own mother + sister. I like that heart-warming kind of stuff, so, have a look, and buy her book. IT’S BRILLIANT.

MasterAmazon at her blog DykesforDykes has been kind enough to share Alixx Dobin’s brilliant piece The Emperor’s New Gender about well, it should be fairly obvious if you’re reading here.

EasilyRiled has a couple of fantastic examples of writing that I’d like to share here, about trying to form alliances against the exploitation of girls and womyn, and how much of a fucking scam Harm Minimisation is as an ideology (and a movement.)

Eve’s Daughter has written an excellent article on the eroticism of female pain, and how if we are going to make the world a non-womon hating place, we are going to need a new, female standard of pain and what it is, and what it isn’t.

An oldie, but a goodie, over at Feminist Reprise, on getting angry. I get a lot of comments telling me I should calm the fuck down, that I’m too young to be this angry, in real life – that I’m too young and pretty to be so pissed off (which certainly DOES NOT calm me down,) that if I really want to be heard, I should scream softer, I should whisper. I should self-censor (often these comments come from freedom of speech pundits.) Shut the fuck up, swallow your own advice and go read that article. I will not ever, nor have I ever been, a quiet or softly spoken person. This is not going to start now. Or ever. Fuck off.

I am not Cake explains why rape is still not funny.

Mishka of FAB Matters has written about the phallusy of cis-privilege before, but this one has PICTURES. I like pictures, and I like teh funniez and Mishka’s fulfils both while stating what’s what for those who can’t differentiate between shit & clay. Not only is it accurate, it’s hilarious. Radical feminists do too have a sense of humor.

m Andrea has written about tranny’s logical fail in well, pretty much any argument, ever. This post is also laced with a picture and a good dose of teh funniez.

The wonderful Ms.Citrus has written a brilliant post about calling out ‘feminist’ men (although, this to me, is an oxymoron, like pro-porn feminist, pro-meat vegan or pro-war pacifist) on their bullshit and disappearing acts. And another one about the systematic view of womyn as holes needing to be filled, complete with horrifying pictures (what’s the difference between a medical model and a sex toy? One has a cervix, one has vibrating features.) Go forth and readify.

Femonade AKA FactCheckMe has been something of a radical feminist paradise of late. Really, you should go over there and read every single post, and every single comment because nearly every one who posts on her blogs knows the difference between shit and clay, is well-read (or good at bluffing!) and has something valuable to contribute. But, I will just link to my favourite three entries of hers at the moment: The similarities between Eminem and transwomen (both are oppressed by their maleness, apparently,) on footbinding, chivalry and rape (and how they’re all intertwined) and mathematical genius exposing the phallisified side of liberal hedonism (aka, sex positive feminism.)

No Excuse for Men has a memorial post about the wonderful Dr. Mary Daly who left this plane earlier this year. I’m super pissed I didn’t discover Daly earlier in my life, but, I think it’s only been recently that I’ve been able to understand and comprehend her work.

I had a lot of trouble picking just one entry from the wonderful Sabina England, a deaf-muslim-anarchist-punk play write and writer. I love her style and her zest for life (even though I’ve never met the womon!) so I thought I’d just set up a link for her latest accomplishment entitled Islamic Orgasm: Fucking in the 99 names of Allah. Even though I’m not really interested in PIV-centric sexuality, Islamic Orgasm looks like it will be an interesting read, and hey, you never know where you could learn something new. I wanna buy a copy for aforementioned birthday.

My favourite non-English language blog Politica Sexual has a fantastic piece (well, when I translated it to English, and read it!) about lesbianism in a hetero-centric patriarchal world. It’s in Portuguese, if you don’t speak it and want to read it in English.

Dirt has a fantastic and informative piece about the reality of bottom surgery for trans-men. Sex-reassignment surgery is a societal-sanctified form of self-mutilation. Don’t buy into the bullshit.

Truth v. Compliance has a fantastic piece about Shelley Lubben, founder of the Pink Cross (an organisation dedicated to helping womyn leaving the pay-per-rape industry. Many pro-pay-rape pundits like to badmouth this brave womon who has dared to critique and industry that makes its money off the backs of womyn, quite literally. When I have some monies that I’m not doing my selfish-white-girl-wants-to-travel thing, I’m going to donate some money to them. You should too.

Undercover Punk has some great news! A website/fakebook group thinking it’s hilarious to trivialise and diminish hate-crimes against womyn (rape) has been shut down! Check out the good news at VICTORY and she has an excellent chart up mapping the differences between radical feminist terminology and liberal hedonist consumer terminology and how the real meaning of the words has been erased, I believe she is still taking suggestions, so if you can think of ways to improve it, be nice and let her know!

Blogger Valerie M has written a brilliant piece directed at castrated men who wish to be recognised as women (they’re not) and why she won’t accept them as a womon.

Last, but certainly not least, is the powerful and potent womon who speaks out against porn, prostitution and the pushing of womyn to accept their roles as inferior sexual beasts of burden. Rebecca Mott has written an incredible and moving poem about Hustler magazine, and prostitution and her own survival of it.

I will post my entry about Family Guy being shit soon and in the mean time..

Seriously, if anyone knows of any radical feminist metal bands then LINK ME UP. Either that, or I’m just going to have to start one myself.'
sam
chaotic good
 
Posts: 4389
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:54 am

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby berryblade » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:04 pm

Thanks so much sam, it's such a huge honour to be an official unofficial hostess of a rad-fem carnival. I saw them around the blogosphere and wondered why it had stopped, now there's a nice big influx of radical feminist bloggers, I'd love to see more of them!
:)
I'll feel no fear or hate as I commit menocide
Kill your masters.
'Menocide' - Otep Shamaya
berryblade
antiporn star
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby laurelin » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:33 pm

it's such a huge honour to be an official unofficial hostess of a rad-fem carnival


Unofficial? I think not! If you revive the Carnival of Radical Feminists then it's official, damnit! So glad to see proper feminist stuff on the blogosphere - it's heartwarming.

The reason we started the Radical Feminist Carnival was the disappointingness of the regular 'Feminist' Carnival.
laurelin
antiporn star
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:31 am
Location: UK

Re: Carnival of Radical Feminists #22, June 09

Postby berryblade » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:49 pm

laurelin wrote:
it's such a huge honour to be an official unofficial hostess of a rad-fem carnival


Unofficial? I think not! If you revive the Carnival of Radical Feminists then it's official, damnit! So glad to see proper feminist stuff on the blogosphere - it's heartwarming.

The reason we started the Radical Feminist Carnival was the disappointingness of the regular 'Feminist' Carnival.



Oh snap! I guess maybe in a few more months well have to have another or something ;)
I'll feel no fear or hate as I commit menocide
Kill your masters.
'Menocide' - Otep Shamaya
berryblade
antiporn star
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: Perth, Australia


Return to Carnival of Radical Feminists #22

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron