Study Suggests Difference Between Female And Male Sexuality

Got something to share with the reading public that isn't an action but should be read?

Moderators: delphyne, oneangrygirl, deedle, sam

Study Suggests Difference Between Female And Male Sexuality

Postby CoolAunt » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:50 am

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 075252.htm

Source: Northwestern University

Posted: June 13, 2003

Study Suggests Difference Between Female And Male Sexuality

EVANSTON, Ill. --- Three decades of research on men's sexual arousal show patterns that clearly track sexual orientation -- gay men overwhelmingly become sexually aroused by images of men and heterosexual men by images of women. In other words, men's sexual arousal patterns seem obvious.

But a new Northwestern University study boosts the relatively limited research on women's sexuality with a surprisingly different finding regarding women's sexual arousal.

In contrast to men, both heterosexual and lesbian women tend to become sexually aroused by both male and female erotica, and, thus, have a bisexual arousal pattern.

"These findings likely represent a fundamental difference between men's and women's brains and have important implications for understanding how sexual orientation development differs between men and women," said J. Michael Bailey, professor and chair of psychology at Northwestern and senior researcher of the study "A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal." The study is forthcoming in the journal Psychological Science.

Bailey's main research focus has been on the genetics and environment of sexual orientation, and he is one of the principal investigators of a widely cited study that concludes that genes influence male homosexuality.

As in many areas of sexuality, research on women's sexual arousal patterns has lagged far behind men's, but the scant research on the subject does hint that, compared with men, women's sexual arousal patterns may be less tightly connected to their sexual orientation.

The Northwestern study strongly suggests this is true. The Northwestern researchers measured the psychological and physiological sexual arousal in homosexual and heterosexual men and women as they watched erotic films. There were three types of erotic films: those featuring only men, those featuring only women and those featuring male and female couples. As with previous research, the researchers found that men responded consistent with their sexual orientations. In contrast, both homosexual and heterosexual women showed a bisexual pattern of psychological as well as genital arousal. That is, heterosexual women were just as sexually aroused by watching female stimuli as by watching male stimuli, even though they prefer having sex with men rather than women.

"In fact, the large majority of women in contemporary Western societies have sex exclusively with men," said Meredith Chivers, a Ph.D. candidate in clinical psychology at Northwestern University, a psychology intern at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and the study's first author. "But I have long suspected that women's sexuality is very different from men's, and this study scientifically demonstrates one way this is so."

The study's results mesh with current research showing that women's sexuality demonstrates increased flexibility relative to men in other areas besides sexual orientation, according to Chivers.

"Taken together, these results suggest that women's sexuality differs from men and emphasize the need for researchers to develop a model of the development and organization of female sexuality independent from models of male sexuality," she said.

The study's four authors include Bailey and three graduate students in Northwestern's psychology department, Chivers, Gerulf Rieger and Elizabeth Latty.

"Since most women seem capable of sexual arousal to both sexes, why do they choose one or the other?" Bailey asked. "Probably for reasons other than sexual arousal."

Sexual arousal is the emotional and physical response to sexual stimuli, including erotica or actual people. It has been known since the early 1960s that homosexual and heterosexual men respond in specific but opposite ways to sexual stimuli depicting men and women. Films provoke the greatest sexual response, and films of men having sex with men or of women having sex with women provoke the largest differences between homosexual and heterosexual men. That is because the same-sex films offer clear-cut results, whereas watching heterosexual sex could be exciting to both homosexual and heterosexual men, but for different reasons.

Typically, men experience genital arousal and psychological sexual arousal when they watch films depicting their preferred sex, but not when they watch films depicting the other sex. Men's specific pattern of sexual arousal is such a reliable fact that genital arousal can be used to assess men's sexual preferences. Even gay men who deny their own homosexuality will become more sexually aroused by male sexual stimuli than by female stimuli.

"The fact that women's sexual arousal patterns are not all predicted by their sexual orientations suggests that men's and women's minds and brains are very different," Bailey said.

To rule out the possibility that the differences between men's and women's genital sexual arousal patterns might be due to the different ways that genital arousal is measured in men and women, the Northwestern researchers identified a subset of subjects: postoperative transsexuals who began life as men but had surgery to construct artificial vaginas.

In a sense, those transsexuals have the brains of men but the genitals of women. Their psychological and genital arousal patterns matched those of men -- those who like men were more aroused by male stimuli and those who like women were more aroused by the female stimuli -- even though their genital arousal was measured in the same way women's was.

"This shows that the sex difference that we found is real and almost certainly due to a sex difference in the brain," said Bailey.


Explainations:

1) The study was conducted using "erotic films" also known as porn. Porn is not sex. Only the males, who porn is made for, would equate porn with sex.

2)Porn is not woman friendly. Most male/female porn depicts degradation of the female, which is not much of a turn on to women. While the female/female porn is typically straight females playing it up for men, typically stupid, and somewhat degrading, the women don't tend to physically harm one another as the men do to the women in male/female porn.

3) In the Western world, we're taught, programmed, conditioned (whatever wording you choose) to equate females to sex. Women are the sex class. Women are sex.
CoolAunt
antiporn star
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:13 pm

Postby oneangrygirl » Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:47 am

there are so many images of hot naked girlz everywhere you go that it's a surprise we aren't ALL lesbians by now.
I guess some slavery feels like freedom.
-Wembley Fraggle
oneangrygirl
antiporn star
 
Posts: 1815
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Land of Soccer Moms

Postby MaddyH » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:51 am

This just feeds more into men's desire that all women are bisexual. Then they have more of a chance to get a threesome with their g/f's best friend, right?

To oag: I agree that with all the images, I wouldn't be suprised if the next few generations of girls are conditioned to be turned on by porn or sexual pics of women.
The emotional, sexual, and psychological stereotyping of females begins when the doctor says, "It's a girl." ~Shirley Chisholm
MaddyH
antiporn star
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Marysville, Washington

Postby annared » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:17 am

To oag: I agree that with all the images, I wouldn't be suprised if the next few generations of girls are conditioned to be turned on by porn or sexual pics of women.


I've been mulling this over for quite a while now, triggered by conversations with my two daughters, esp the 18yo. She feels she is expected to "act out" men's interpretation of female sexuality in acceptance of porn, bi-sexual fooling around with friends ect ect for fear of looking very un-cool. My J has got an amazing awareness for her age, which is just as well, but i know where you're coming from with the *conditioning*

Sometimes it takes an awful lot of energy, just not to fit in and shut up! How long would it take for it to become internalised?
"...it is the very act of women's bodies being bought and sold by men that sustains the subordinate position of women and children on a global scale". Julie Bindel ________________
annared
antiporn star
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:38 am

Postby MaddyH » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:50 am

Good question - I know brainwashing can be done in a suprisingly short time if the subject is isolated enough and the treatment is consistent enough.
The emotional, sexual, and psychological stereotyping of females begins when the doctor says, "It's a girl." ~Shirley Chisholm
MaddyH
antiporn star
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Marysville, Washington

Postby Army Of Me » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:33 am

Again, I have stated this in other posts, one day, women, especially young ones, will realize that they are just being conditioned into sexual slavery, girl/girl, or threesomes, "oh sweetie, whatever you want me to do, I don't want to lose you". (And he knows he can get it elsewhere too.)

How many girls do you know who are hot to see a guy on guy thing?

This is why a lot of prostitutes like the fact that they are charging money for sex - at least they're getting some compensation for acting out something they don't want to, and they don't give a shit if the guy goes elsewhere - she knows he'll have to pay even more money.
Last edited by Army Of Me on Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
"You can't start a fire without a spark" - B. Springsteen
Army Of Me
antiporn star
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:13 am

Postby MaddyH » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:35 am

Good points Army of Me.
The emotional, sexual, and psychological stereotyping of females begins when the doctor says, "It's a girl." ~Shirley Chisholm
MaddyH
antiporn star
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Marysville, Washington

Postby oneangrygirl » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:37 pm

not sure sam would agree with your last statement, but she's on vacation.
I guess some slavery feels like freedom.
-Wembley Fraggle
oneangrygirl
antiporn star
 
Posts: 1815
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Land of Soccer Moms

Postby Army Of Me » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:28 pm

I did not post it as something to be agreed with or disagreed with - that's just how it is for some prostitutes. I had a feeling this would be jumped on.

I am not advocating, prostitution by any means, of course I'm not. But if this site really wants to discuss and find out about all aspects of prostitution and how some women might come into thinkng of going into it, then that is one of them.

If she doesn't agree, or doesn't like the comment, then she can say so, (the last thing I want to do is upset sam, or anyone here), but as I said, it is not an advertisment for becoming a prostitute (I have made my views clear on other posts), nor saying it's a good thing, but gives an insight into the mind-set of some women who sell sex, and is meant to give an idea of how culture is giving some women the idea that if they are expected to do things sexually they don't want to, and have to pretend, they may get the idea to do it and be compensated.

It is meant to be a derogatory comment on the sexualising of culture, and it's subtle pushing of women into performing sexual acts they don't really want to do, thereby sublty planting the idea of going that one step further and being paid, and is not a comment to promote or glorify prostitution by any means. I feel that this is an important issue and needs addressing, as this subtle pressure and the connection in women' minds being made in culture does exist, even in places where there are strict laws on selling sex.

If this forum is not open to all discussion about this subject, as it claims to be, especially by someone who has worked in the business in a country where there the laws on selling sex are a bit less strict, (and I don't claim to be the world's expert, I merely have a certain perspective because of this - I was not a traffiked woman, but neither was I highly overjoyed at having to be forced into selling my body and would never ever promote this to anyone) - then I will remove the post and bow out graciously thanks.
Last edited by Army Of Me on Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
"You can't start a fire without a spark" - B. Springsteen
Army Of Me
antiporn star
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:13 am

Postby CoolAunt » Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:53 am

Annared, my heart goes out to your daughter and the women of her generation. It must be so difficult for them to make wise choices while just getting along and not being a social outcast. It must be difficult for their mothers and fathers, at least the ones who care enough to know what the girls are up against and the decisions they're faced with. My heart goes out to you, too.

The only advice I can offer it to tell her and the remind her frequently that any boy/man worthy of her and worth her keeping around wants her to be true to herself first. He'll know that if she can't be true to herself, then she can't be true to anything, not even him. And should this smart man not come along any time soon, then she needs to make sure her decisions don't cause her to dislike who she sees in the mirror.

ArmyOfMe, I'm just guessing here but I don't believe Sam's disagreement would also mean banishment. Hell, I'm not even a radfem and she hasn't tossed me. I do hope that we can be ourselves here, disagree at times, and then move forward in working toward our common goal: the eradication of pornstitution.

Big hugs to all of my Genderberg.com sisters and brothers and this morning. :D
CoolAunt
antiporn star
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:13 pm

Postby oneangrygirl » Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:14 am

perhaps i should have let sam speak for herself.
nobody is going to ban you.
I guess some slavery feels like freedom.
-Wembley Fraggle
oneangrygirl
antiporn star
 
Posts: 1815
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Land of Soccer Moms

Postby gerry » Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:43 pm

Sexuality studies are almost all alike---they have either a "science" base or a "psycological" base---the social world is conveniently abolished which means the results only make one's head spin and spin in circles, and bow to the smoggy results of "scientific" authority. The whole question of power and power differences, of course, is never addressed. Or how the status quo is maintained.
gerry
antiporn star
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:38 pm
Location: south of Montreal


Return to essays, articles, rants for public view

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests